It is deeply saddening’: the way 30 captive beluga whales are being used as tools in dispute over animal welfare.
The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a closed attraction, government authorities and advocacy groups.
But those most familiar with the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.
After the national authorities blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near the famous falls where they are kept warned to end their lives unless the government funds the cost of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain situation.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and social skills indicate they are highly cognitive animals – something a former trainer learned personally.
Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required earning the trust of the marine predators.
“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and quirks in their personalities. She developed a special affection for two female belugas with opposing natures.
“One whale accepted me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I view connection.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Her interaction with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.
During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The facility did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and 24/7 supervision than any human in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was fired from the facility in the spring following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park suspected information of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in despair. She says the park’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to euthanize even a one beluga would require “significant manpower”, equipment and heavy equipment.
“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for demands for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.
In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a request to transfer the whales to China.
“Allowing the request would have meant a ongoing situation in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official wrote. “As society, we know that marine mammals should be in the sea, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience permit an relocation that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the minister’s remarks indicate a more general lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As officials attempt to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.
A proposed refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be contentious. The future facility, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a permanent answer for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.
Others say the prospect of a protected habitat reflects a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the near future.
An official, leader of the initiative, said the site will simulate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|